Grace Tyler

Grace Tyler

March 30, 2023

Join Our Team

Thank you for your interest in working for Save Our Canyons. Please find our open positions below:

March 29, 2023

Roadless Rule 101

On March 17th, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) announced a new public comment period ending on April 18th regarding two new “Supplemental Information Reports” for the proposed gondola up Little Cottonwood Canyon (LCC), along with other Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) alternatives. The first report assesses whether the gondola would be exempt from the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RACR) and its potential impacts on inventoried roadless areas. The second report provides another air quality analysis. Before submitting a comment to UDOT, it’s incredibly important to understand what a roadless area is, the history of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (also known as the Roadless Rule), and the connection between the gondola in LCC and the Roadless Rule.

Check out the following interactive map to see how the proposed gondola system would pass through three roadless areas. 

What are roadless areas and why are they important?

In 2001, the US Forest Service took inventory of roadless areas for their potential to be designated as an “Inventoried Roadless Area” (IRA). This designation prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in these areas. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule covers nearly 60 million acres of national forests, 4 million of which are in Utah’s national forests. 

So how does a forest receive “inventoried roadless area” protections? It can be based on size (at least 5000 acres) or location (sharing a border with a Wilderness Area). Many popular areas in the Wasatch are protected under the Roadless Rule. If you’ve been to White Pine Lake, Rock Canyon, or Mount Timpanogos via the Timpooneke trailhead, you were trekking through protected roadless areas! 

The Forest Service limited road construction in these areas because of its negative impacts, such as habitat fragmentation and degradation, reduced water quality for wildlife and human uses, increased erosion and slope instability, and increased human disturbances in remote areas (such as an increase in human-caused fires). 

Little Cottonwood Canyon contains the White Pine IRA and portions of the Twin Peaks and Lone Peak IRAs. These areas provide important ecosystem services and recreation opportunities with limited to no permanent road disturbance. They are prime habitats for bears, elk, eagles, and other unique animal and plant species. In short, these roadless areas possess tremendous ecological and social value that are increasingly rare as the Wasatch faces rapid development. 

What is the difference between inventoried roadless areas and Wilderness areas? 

If you’ve been up Little Cottonwood Canyon, you may have seen the brown Forest Service signs for Twin Peaks Wilderness and Lone Peak Wilderness. This may lead you to question, what’s the difference between roadless areas and Wilderness areas? 

Designated Wilderness areas receive the government’s highest level of land protection under the Wilderness Act of 1964. This Act created a National Wilderness Preservation System and sought to preserve areas where “the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor.” 

Inventoried roadless areas, on the other hand, are typically the undeveloped areas of national Forests that are either 5,000 acres or larger or bordering a Wilderness area. They provide clean drinking water and large, relatively undisturbed habitat for populations of threatened and endangered species. These areas preserve biological diversity and provide opportunities for dispersed outdoor recreation amidst a rapidly urbanizing landscape. 

Before an agency can recommend an area of land to be designated Wilderness, it must first be inventoried roadless. So all Wilderness areas are roadless, but not all roadless areas are Wilderness. For example, Twin Peak, Lone Peaks, and Mount Olympus are all designated Wilderness areas AND protected by the Roadless Rule, whereas White Pine is not a designated Wilderness area but is still protected by the Roadless Rule. 

Why did UDOT release additional reports and open another comment period? 

During the EIS process, UDOT failed to fully examine the impacts of the Roadless Rule. The proposed gondola system would situate towers, angle stations, snowsheds, and the clearing of vegetation within one of the Wasatch’s most protected areas, impacting not just one, but three roadless areas in Little Cottonwood Canyon: Twin Peaks, Lone Peak, and White Pine Roadless Areas. 

UDOT claims the construction of a gondola is exempt from the Roadless Rule because it isn’t a road for motor vehicles, and that any associated timber cutting and removal would be incidental. It says the snowshed may be exempt because it would promote safety against avalanche hazards. The Forest Service will make the final decision in its Record of Decision for the SR210 (road going up LCC) project.

The process that UDOT is undertaking is a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and involves transportation analysis for the SR210 highway. Even if the gondola system isn’t defined as a road, it would be built for highway purposes and is thereby inconsistent with the Roadless Rule and the 2003 Wasatch-Cache National Forest Plan. 

The roadless rule, in contrast with the Wilderness Act, allows for some types of disturbances. However, we believe it is a poor interpretation that is likely to be challenged to suggest the gondola system (towers, snow sheds, angle stations and timber removal) is exempt from the Roadless Rule. These areas have environmental values (e.g. watershed, views, dispersed recreation, timber, vegetation, and habitat) that are mandated to be protected under Roadless Rule and are inherent to Little Cottonwood Canyon, which UDOT’s preferred alternative would destroy.   

Learn more: 

Protect Parley's Canyon. We need you to sign the petition to Tree Farm LLC, Jesse Lassley, and Granite Construction (GVA) advocating for the protection of the Wasatch Mountains.

January 20, 2023

Crystal Chen

Policy Associate

January 19, 2023

Katie Balakir

Policy Associate

Salt Lake City will set a new, positive standard for how an Olympic Games is run and show the world that embracing the values of inclusion, fairness, and sustainability can enhance the popularity and impact of a major sporting event. The Organizing Committee will enter and be held accountable to a Community Benefits Agreement including the following sections:

Housing

Housing built or renovated for the Games will be affordable, equitably dispersed, accessible, and energy efficient. 

Jobs

Everyone employed to help prepare for the Games or employed during the Games will be paid a living wage. Construction contracts will be awarded to licensed and responsible bidders. Efforts will be made to incentivize hiring local residents, women, people of color, and people with disabilities. Transportation. Investments in public transportation will be made to facilitate less reliance on cars both during and after the Games, with a priority toward projects that will improve air quality and result in heavy resident use, taking into account underserved areas. 

Homeless Services

Displacement of low-income residents during the Games will be mitigated by opening one or more temporary housing shelters and expanding the availability of emergency food.

Environment

The Games will strive to achieve net-zero emissions and zero waste, prioritizing use of already-existing infrastructure and venues and holding new buildings to the highest reasonable efficiency standards. The Tri-Canyons of Millcreek, Big Cottonwood and Little Cottonwood Canyons will not be used to host Games events or venues. Environmental accountability will be overseen by an environmental advisory committee. 

Civil Rights

The Games will adopt a code of conduct for both government and private security. Surveillance technology used for security purposes during the Games will include transparency and accountability protections and be overseen by a privacy advisory committee.

Affordability

Opportunities will be created for low and middle-income Utah residents to be able to attend some Games events for free or reduced rates.  Accessibility. The Games will be welcoming and inclusive for all, with universally accessible venues and events, and disability awareness training for public-facing staff and volunteers.

Transparency

The Organizing Committee will be a model of transparency, making regular meetings open to the public and sharing all documents online. A community advisory board will monitor progress on the Community Benefits Agreement and other community issues.

2030 Vision Statement Endorsing Organizations:

  • AFL-CIO
  • Better Utah
  • Citizens Education Project
  • Crossroads Urban Center
  • HEAL Utah
  • Impact Hub
  • League of Women Voters of Salt Lake
  • Save Our Canyons
  • Utah Building Trades
  • Utah Clean Energy
  • Utah Coalition of La Raza
  • Utahns Against Hunger
  • Voices for Utah Children
  • Westside Coalition 

Media Roundup: The Truth About The Proposed Gondola In Little Cottonwood Canyon. UDOT continues to review their proposed alternatives for transportation in Little Cottonwood Canyon. They have had their hands full due to your action and participation. With over 13,000 comments submitted it is crystal clear that you care about an outcome that is a win not just for resorts, but for year-round visitors to this canyon and the valley residents that depend on its water. 

The following podcast created by Nicole Milavetz (@nmilavetz) covers the topic of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Little Cottonwood Canyon Draft Environmental Impact Study (DEIS) featuring Carl Fisher Executive Director of Save Our Canyons and Leadership of Students for the Wasatch (SFW). 

SFW is an organization at the University of Utah which was created in response to the proposed gondola that is part of the UDOT DEIS. This group focuses on educating the public and providing opportunities for people to take action.

Video Credit Chris Monte and Lane Aasen 

Full Podcast 

About Nicole Milavetz the creator of the podcast: 

Nicole Milavetz is an environmentalist from Salt Lake City Utah. She is a recent graduate from the University of Colorado Boulder with a BA in Environmental Studies and Geography. Nicole is passionate about environmental journalism and podcasting, national parks, public land management, and environmental justice. She currently writes for the Frontline Climate Magazine, which tackles climate change news and top stories, while working to engage the public and spark important conversations about the climate crisis. Nicole hopes to pursue a career in environmental journalism and advocacy, raising awareness about climate change while creating community in the process. 

A key component of 77mm’s core mission is to provide greater access to the world of skiing & mountain living through art, design, and architecture—without sacrificing on environmental concerns.

77mm takes its name from the tail width of the first Howard Head aluminum standard ski. In 1947, Howard Head, a self-educated structural engineer working in airplane manufacturing, was convinced there was a way to make a lighter ski using the material and structural analysis from airplane construction. He quit his job and put all resources into creating a makeshift workshop. After 40 iterations, he birthed the first successful non-wood ski in history. In 1949, he produced 50 pairs, in 1950, he produced 300, and by 1953, he had produced and sold over 4000 pairs of reformed skis. By the end of the decade, Head became the largest ski manufacturer in the country.

My fascination with this story is rooted in the unintended cultural and architectural impact of Head’s product innovation. The significant improvement in ski functionality created a cultural reset: more people interested in skiing, improved capabilities for current skiers, and a greater demand for ski resorts and ski-related products. This catalyst resulted in new events and competitions, further product innovation in apparel, and innovation in cinematography/digital media—the birth of a completely new culture.

It’s with the fascination of the causal relationship between physical product and development that 77mm explores the physical manifestations of culture derived from skiing and mountain living. My driving thesis is that the reshaping of physical products inevitably changes culture, manifested through perceptions, actions, language, art, design, music, film, education, transportation, and architecture.

Simply put, if we can reinterpret ski culture through product innovation, we can influence the architectural development and overall perception of mountain living. Thanks to organizations like Save Our Canyons we can ensure that any progress in development considers the environment as a serious, paramount concern. For this reason, we’ve decided to donate a portion of proceeds from all ‘UTAH’ products moving forward—starting with our signature ‘UTAH’ Cap.

77mm Utah Gear 

 

The proposed mining operation for Parley's Canyon will have a dramatic effect on the entire Wasatch Range. The size and scope of the project presents this as the largest mining operation within the Wasatch Front since the establishment of the Point of the Mountain quarry.

Stopping a mining operation in Parley's Canyon includes conversations across many different platforms, organizations, county officials, state legislators, and federal agencies. All of these moving parts created a demand for a resource page to best inform and prepare you to be involved and find your voice as an advocate for the Wasatch. This page will continually update as this process continues to evolve.

Acronym’s Defined:

DNR - Department of Natural Resources

DOGM - Division of Oil, Mining, and Gas

SMO - Small Mining Operation

LMO - Large Mining Operation

NOI - Notice of Intent

EPA - Environmental Protection Agency

NEPA - National Environmental Policy Act

FCOZ - Foothills and Canyons Overlay Zones 

FR - Forestry and Recreation Zone

SLCo - Salt Lake County

Additional ways to act now:

Read the revisions of Salt Lake County Ordinances on 12/10/2021 below:

pdf Meeting Minutes from Salt Lake County on 12/10

pdfMineral Extraction Ordinance

  • SOC supports the following revision of Salt Lake County Ordinances:
    • It prohibits the uses of “mineral extraction and processing; mine; quarry; gravel pit; including crushers or concrete batching plants used in connection with and as part of an operation for the removal of sand, gravel and/or rock aggregate in the Forest Recreation Zone and in the Foothills and Canyons Overlay Zone.
    • It establishes a process for the County planning director to decide whether or not a use not listed is prohibited or related to a conditional or permitted use in the relevant ordinances.